Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service


posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
7/23/2017 8:18 am

I spoke of looking outside in, instead of inside out. what that means is to not listen to the rhetoric. but to judge the meaning of things by the results.

One can listen to Trump and hear about all the great, wonderful, unbelievable things he's going to do. Some obviously believe it and others know it's a lie. It's so blatant that no explanation is needed, no proof is needed that Trump is lying. the proof is not in the rhetoric, that opposes what he says, but in the results of what he says.

The Russian interference thing is a little harder to understand the outside in view.
First thing is that Trump Won.. That's a result.
Second thing is, what said during the campaign. has resulted in lies, It's a result That he has NOT accomplished anything of what he said.
Third, the Russians wanted Trump to win, They did things to accomplish that. It has now been proven, they sided with Trump. Now that's a result, not a reason. The reasons why the Russians wanted Trump, and what they got from it, or what Trump got doesn't matter.
Fourth, all the results speak of the continuing lies from Trump.
We do not need to discuss the extent of Russian interference the meaning of Russian interference, Collusion, or anything else that ties Trump with the Russians......The results speak for themselves.

So it is, with Carrier, healthcare, the wall, tax reform, the news media, emoluments, ethics.....and everything else Trump is involved with.
We do not need to speculate.. just look at the results.

The Trump supporter will say there is no PROOF of collusion.... well I have a different view, when it come to this.. There is NO proof there was NOT collusion, not one single shred of evidence, That Trump did not collude.


jiminycricket1 74M
13732 posts
7/23/2017 8:28 am

Usually in a court of law it is appropriate to convict someone, to show the motive, the means, the opportunity......and one other thing.......

What has been shown is the motive, the means and the opportunity....
No alibis, no opposing scenarios, no alternative facts, no retribution or remorse.

And the other thing ... Well, and for Trump to get away with it, he'll get away with it........OVER MY DEAD BODY!