Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service


posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
9/7/2016 3:37 am

    Quoting  :

Bleating again I see.

I would have thought EVEN YOU would have noticed that most human's are anti- big game hunting nowadays.
But then, they have what you do not...CLASS...and the ability to think.


bijou624

9/7/2016 6:54 am

Is that Sarah Palin I see hiding behind the bush? Hope the Trump boys have 'fun' on their killing spree. What a poor example they are for young people.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
9/7/2016 10:42 am

is it not clear that the sanctity of life resides in it's bounds?

As God has proclaimed life to be boundless, God has inferred there is no sanctity

Those that see themselves, Godlike, have no sanctity for life. Yet, as to their own life, they reside in the sanctuary of the sanctity of others.

*********8

Just some more hobble gobble from me? As I sit wishing people would try to understand, I know they won't, just dismiss it as some more confusing circular talk. But in my mind, it is the essence of everything we talk about

Too many Conservatives, and some Liberals, believe the rightness of their beliefs to the extent of the wrong, that they oppose, but fail to see that gift is only granted, by the beliefs of many of those they oppose.
That which they would put asunder, only destroys their own rights
Their sanctity of thought would be destroyed, when they no longer can live in the sanctuary of those they oppose
.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
9/7/2016 11:21 am

It it possible for human to be able to see? That winning can be same as losing.
that keeping score, although innately not bad, can be made bad.

Is it possible for humans to believe in the concept of duality?
Where good and evil, winning and losing, right and wrong, and Left and Right, are not diametrically opposing but opposite sides of the same coin.

Is it possible for human to understand? that understanding is not about agreement or disagreement. But understanding is it's own reward.

Is it possible that the meaning of life is about the search for truth, instead of knowing the truth?
Is it possible that humans are more alike than different?


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
9/7/2016 12:16 pm

    Quoting  :

I know you don't understand what I say.
but let me try to clarify to you personally, as an example of what I mean.

What you think in regard to destroying opposing ideas. Is something you cannot win. Never, ever win.

Obviously you lack the respect for the ideas of others.

Ironically it is in the respect others have for your ideas, even if they oppose them, that your ideas are even able to exist. If not for the respect others have of your ideas, you would be destroyed. Not that some wouldn't want to do that, but in my moral equivalency test they are no better than you. It's just not about who wins.

That which you would do to others, most others will not do to you.
You are allowed to exist in the sanctuary of their understanding of your rights, even if you don't understand theirs.

Lets assume you could win the argument, although it will never,ever happen.
What you would consider a win, would be your greatest lost possible.
For that which you would choose to put asunder, would only put you asunder.

Nobody can win this battle, Winners simply become losers. As they simply destroy the essence of what they believe they are fighting for..

Too bad, you don't have a clue what I'm talking about, But that is what makes you who you are. I have no choice , in my world, but to respect who you are even if I don't like it. So, for now, I choose to allow you to exist. Can you say the same about me?


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
9/7/2016 1:17 pm

Big,

explanation is always necessary for you.

so to understand the metaphor of the lion, let me explain.

One must understand what a lion is, what a lion does, and what a lion represents.

why a lion becomes a trophy ?

Think about it, and see that those who wish to kill the lion, for the most part, only wish to become the lion
.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
9/7/2016 1:32 pm

    Quoting  :

We know that Trump's son did not kill a human, but a lion. But in my mind, the representation of the photo. is appropriate, not to the reality, but to the spirit of what he did. In trying to kill the human spirit.

"Those that see themselves, Godlike, have no sanctity for life. Yet, as to their own life, they reside in the sanctuary of the sanctity of others." JC

Try to understand this.. As it pertains to what I'm talking to you about.

Obviously Trump's son, does have a severity limited view of the sanctity of life.

As those who do believe complete in the sanctity of life, defend the lion.
It is in their defense of the lion, that Trump's son is able to exist.
It's is in their belief in the sanctity of the lion's life, that they also believe in the sanctity of Trump's son life.

Without their belief in the sanctity of the lions life, Trump's son would be hunted down and destroyed, he would simply become the lion.

If Trump's son, or you wishes to persuade others that the lions life has no sanctity. You all but destroy your own. As others will only see you for what you are, and the lions you think you are, and they will hunt you down.


jiminycricket1 73M
13732 posts
9/7/2016 2:48 pm

Big let me take you way off the reservation. for explanation purposes.

We see the photo different, that's obvious.

Lulu did not have the possibility to post the photo I see,
but keeping her photo in mind.

I'd like you to try and do something to be able see what i see.

Where, lulu changed the dead lion to human.

Look at this photo and change Trump's son to the lion.
Maybe then it would possible for you see what I see. Think about how you'd feel about a lion with it's arm draped around a human. Then realize, I feel the same way, with lulu's picture, as it is.

Ah, I know you are incapable to see what I see....but maybe someone else here can.


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
9/8/2016 1:17 am

    Quoting  :

So what's your opinion on Dan's "sick Joke" blog? Is that what you call "class"?

I notice your opinion on that blog was glaringly absent. If Lulu or I had posted that... you, Dan and all your other bigot friends would be yelling AND ACCUSING US OF ATTACKING YOUR "RELIGION"

Nobody forced...or even asked you to comment here, you could have chosen not to, just as you did with Dan's blog.

So just why is Dan's sick joke classier than Lulu's not so sick meme...and why is it ok for you to post two tit for tat blogs?

Neither Dan nor Lulu are in the wrong here...but your prejudice and bigotry are glaringly obvious.

AND...THISE ARE YOUR COOKIES.


Katie_au_lait 78F
7026 posts
9/8/2016 7:22 am

    Quoting  :

What a load of baloney!

So, you think it's perfectly ok for men to kill animals just for fun, but for anyone else to create a satirical meme about it shows "no class!"?

Killing a beautiful majestic elephant just to cut it's tail off, is an abhorrent criminal waste of life to millions of humans the world over who are trying to preserve the existence of our animals. Lions are also endangered as are many other animals
Elephants have it hard enough with poachers without rich men killing them for no good reason...except for "having fun" And doing it with guns.
B]You think that's "classy"?
You don't find it totally offensive?

Your "opinion" Is nothing but intolerance and prejudice.

No imagination? You can't even use the brain you supposedly have.

BTW...You should thank your lucky stars that you are not an endangered animal
YOU'D HAVE A VERY DIFFERENT OPINION OF WHAT "CLASS" IS THEN