Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > shuel2002 > Speak Your Mind |
|
CENSORSHIP HAS HIT A NEW LOW! I put up a post that "IT'S A GIRL" disappeared from my own blog list. I then heard from SFF. They took down my post because it had a in it. Now I need someone to explain to me how they could object to pictures of the new princess, which is up all over the news. Also, there are pictures of posted on some member's posts, including grandchildren. I like seeing those pics. What could they possibly have against them? I may have to remove some of the pics, to put my post back up (if I could find the post) but I hope some of you write SFF to tell them what you think of this foolish rule. I certainly did. Thanks. UPDATE: I reposted my "IT'S A GIRL" post. I found it when I did a search for "GIRL" in my blog. I deleted 2 pics of the new princess but for some reason, the first one hasn't been removed. I can't try again because when I click to edit it, it's not showing up. Strange. Elaine Shuel |
|||
|
shuele.... I went through a similar experience with a blog.... about drove me crazy... I finally just gave up.... there was something about trying to post more than one pic.... I evidently didn't use the right process..... LOL  I wish they would be consistent. IF one can't post pictures of children, then NO children should be posted. I don't get how come it's fine sometimes but not fine other times. I don't blame you that you gave up. I just removed the pics that I hoped bothered them.Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
If they can't know that it's William and Kate and the royal baby, I don't know what to say. It is today's top news story. I could understand that they don't want children in compromising photos, but the pictures posted were nothing like that. I do thank you for your comment, LakeWalker. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
That's fine, Roxy. Thanks for your comment. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
I read your blog first and saw the adorable pictures. SFF is full of strange happenings....... 
| ||
|
Exactly. Thanks Liszt. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
It went back up after I removed 2 baby pics. For some reason, it is still showing 1 of the 2 pics that I removed. I think SFF doesn't see that 1st pic. It's very strange. It seems to allow the pics of Kate holding the baby. Thanks Pat. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
If a picture of a baby is too sensitive to SFF censors, that's ridiculous. Thanks Bob. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
I read your blog first and saw the adorable pictures. SFF is full of strange happenings....... Yes they are strange and inconsistent.Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
Its still all there on my blog list. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
Elaine the obviously don't sensor all of them as my picture didn't disappear that was on my last post. I think they must do it randomly as there have been lots of pictures of babies posted on blogs.
| ||
|
Elaine the obviously don't sensor all of them as my picture didn't disappear that was on my last post. I think they must do it randomly as there have been lots of pictures of babies posted on blogs. Elaine Shuel
| ||
|
Bill, as I explained, there was ANOTHER baby picture that I had to remove, for them to put the post back on. There were actually 2 pictures that were removed but one is still showing. It was ONLY after I removed them, that the post got back up. Elaine Shuel
|
×
×