Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service


crazyhorse1946 78M
1406 posts
3/28/2015 2:43 am
A Simple Question


It is amazing how a simple question can cause a complex lie to collapse like a house of cards. The simple question was asked by Bill O’Reilly of the Fox News Channel, and it was addressed to two Democrats. He asked what has Hillary Clinton ever accomplished.

The two Democrats immediately sidestepped the question and started reciting their talking points in favor of Hillary. But O’Reilly kept coming back to the fact that nothing they were talking about was an accomplishment.

News & Politics
Guns & Patriots
Money
Health
Newsletters

Columnists
Michael Barone
Pat Buchanan
Ann Coulter
Newt Gingrich
Charles Krauthammer
Larry Kudlow
David Limbaugh
Michelle Malkin
Thomas Sowell
John Stossel
George Will
Walter Williams
Byron York
Contributors
Steven Greenhut
David Harsanyi
John Hayward
Raymond Ibrahim
Betsy McCaughey
Teresa Mull
Nicholas Vardy
Chris Versace
E-Letters
Daily Events
RedState Morning Briefing
Ann Coulter Letter
Guns & Patriots
RedState
About

Editor's Choice
A Simple Question

Thomas Sowell | Tuesday Mar 24, 2015 10:29 AM
A Simple Question

Share on Facebook 1K
1K SHARES

It is amazing how a simple question can cause a complex lie to collapse like a house of cards. The simple question was asked by Bill O’Reilly of the Fox News Channel, and it was addressed to two Democrats. He asked what has Hillary Clinton ever accomplished.

The two Democrats immediately sidestepped the question and started reciting their talking points in favor of Hillary. But O’Reilly kept coming back to the fact that nothing they were talking about was an accomplishment.

For someone who has spent her entire adult life in politics, including being a Senator and then a Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has nothing to show for all those years — no significant legislation of hers that she got passed in the Senate, and only an unbroken series of international setbacks for the United States during her time as Secretary of State.

Before Barack Obama entered the White House and appointed Mrs. Clinton Secretary of State, Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq had notified their higher ups, stationed in Pakistan, that their cause was lost in Iraq and that there was no point sending more men there.

Hosni Mubarak was in charge in Egypt. He posed no threat to American or Western interests in the Middle East or to Christians within Egypt or to Israel. But the Obama administration threw its weight behind the Muslim Brotherhood, which took over and began terrorizing Christians in Egypt and promoting hostility to Israel.

In Libya next door, the Qaddafi regime had already given up its weapons of mass destruction, after they saw what happened to Saddam Hussein in Iraq. But President Obama’s foreign policy, carried out by Secretary of State Clinton, got Qaddafi removed, after which Libya became a terrorist haven where an American ambassador was killed, for the first time in decades.

Hillary Clinton became an iconic figure by feeding the media and the left the kind of rhetoric they love. Barack Obama did the same and became president. Neither had any concrete accomplishments besides rhetoric beforehand, and both have had the opposite of accomplishments after taking office.

They have something else in common. They attract the votes of those people who vote for demographic symbolism — “the first black president” to be followed by “the first woman president” — and neither to be criticized, lest you be denounced for racism or sexism.

Whoever holds that office makes decisions involving the life and death of Americans and — especially if Iran gets a nuclear arsenal — the life and death of this nation. It took just two nuclear bombs — neither of them as powerful as those available today — to get a very tough nation like Japan to surrender.

When people like that surrender after two nuclear bombs, do not imagine that today’s soft Americans — led by the likes of Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton — will fight on after New York and Chicago have been reduced to radioactive ashes.

Meanwhile, ISIS and other terrorists are giving us a free demonstration of what surrender would mean. But perhaps we can kick the can down the road, and leave that as a legacy to our and grandchildren, along with the national debt.

From article by Thomas Sowell

bijou624

3/28/2015 9:16 am

Hi Crazy: I am also wondering what the big fascination with Hillary is and why she is so popular. She seems a little snippy and irritable when just being asked a question and after all she is almost 70 years old now. I don't know whether she would be a good or bad president, but aren't there any other Democrats on the horizon?


Nileyears 71F
4208 posts
3/28/2015 11:28 am

Oh come on now, she has accomplished a lot of things, just ask all those dead friends and co-workers!


Rentier1

4/3/2015 6:35 pm

I, for one, am impressed with how long she put up with Slick Willie's shenanigans.