Reset Password
Reset Link Sent
| Blogs > > My Blog |
|
Member Deleted Post This post has been deleted by |
|||
|
This is what I heard.. Q What would be your foreign policy? A. I'd increase military spending Q. What would you do about ISIS? A. I'd increase military spending Q. what about Iran and the nuclear deal, what would you do? A. I would not agree to it and I'd increase military spending Q Can you name three things you would do for the economy and income inequality? A. I'd cut taxes, create jobs, and cut taxes to create jobs Q. How would you balance the budget? A. I'd cut taxes, increase military spending, defund planned parenthood, and stop Obamacare Q. How do you stand or the Pro-choice/Pro-life issue A. I think an abortion is an abortion, I beleive in the sanctity of life. I would.. I'd cut taxes, increase military spending, defund planned parenthood, and stop Obamacare Q. What about other women's issues? A. I think women are people too.... I'd cut taxes, increase military spending, defund planned parenthood, and revoke Obamacare Q. What about race relations? A. I did not have relations with that non-white woman! Don't you think that's a personal question, you shouldn't be asking here. Q. Does God speak to you? A. Yes. everyday Q What does God tell you? A. cut taxes, increase military spending, defund planned parenthood, and stop Obamacare, and screw all the non-white people you can! 
| ||
|
If your best argument is “You just don’t get it,” you’re probably the person who doesn’t get it. maisie, We're all suppose to try and understand you, you think what you say is plain as day. But you don't even try and understand what we say, and it that regard "you just don't get it" Anything that we say, that you'd actually have to think about is not worth your time and effort, so "you just don't get it" Everything is one-sided and it's always your side...so "You just don't get it" Because you've already made up your mind....."You can't get it"
| ||
|
Didn't really watch the debate, I see. What happened to "open mindedness" and "paradox" and not just looking for "confirmation bias". Guess that doesn't apply to you Try a little humor.. it's good for the soul
| ||
|
maisie Acts of terror and terrorism....Give Obama and us a frick'n break! If we are going to split hares, I want the rabbit's foot, and a piece of tail! If you can't understand it....Get a life! I would say the one different between the two, is knowing who the perpetrator is. Obama didn't know precisely. So an "act of terror" not "terrorism" was the appropriate response. I admire you so much, I want to be like you.... So no matter how you respond or what you say. It doesn't matter to me.. In this case I'm right, you can't change my mind. So I'm going to choose to "not get it" whatever you say, so don't bother. We've discussed this a zillion times....When you don't get it...its not the answers you give, but the understanding of the frick'n question.
| ||
|
You are proving my point. You say that because I do not agree with you, I don't get it. Because I do not change my mind because you disagree, I "Don't get it". maisie, I could care less if you agree, but we need to be discussing the same question... if you don't understand my question, how can you understand my answer....I'm tired of this crap you pull. State the question before giving any answer. My little attempt at humor is funny because in part it's true. You do the same thing.....The answers you give are all the same no matter what the question is.
| ||
|
But he did not ever in that speech call Benghazi a terror attack, and that is what Romney was calling him out on. Obama blamed the video and kept trying to sell us that it was "spontaneous protest" maisie,,, sush, sush, sush  na na, na na na na, na na na na la la la la la la la. 
| ||
|
Read the Rose Garden speech- he never called that attack "terrorism" He spoke of "acts of terror" in general terms and then spent the next two weeks blaming a video." "It does make a difference whether or not Obama called that a "terror attack. He refuses to say "Radical Islam" or call anyone an "Islamist Extremist" You cannot defeat and enemy you do not identify." Give me a fricken break! and take your head from out of your ass. what should he have done, left the rosegarden and called a nuclear strike? He didn't know who exactly was responsible. Hell, yes, i'm calling you names I must be stupid to not know the difference between "acts of terror" and "terrorism" Who are you trying to kid? Don't even talk to me about it...talk to your friends.. they'll agree with you. I will never agree that acts of terror and terrorism aren't really the same thing. the importance of this is the same as a nit on a gnat's nut. Your problem of course is you can't tell the truth, because you don't have any balls! There are so many questions about Benghazi.... and you dwell on this shit.......you're a hateful person...it's all about Obama and your hatred. Admit it. you coward!
| ||
|
You know the total assinine thought you folks have... is that everything I have said here is in support of Obama. Not one word I have uttered is in support of Obama. You folks..."DON'T GET IT" Every single assumption you make, is that someone who disagree with you or, the mere idea of not full agreement with you is supporting the other side. You not only "don't get it" you're manipulative, controlling, prejudiced, unthinking and STUPID! I once said I don't call people stupid, who I think ARE really stupid....I just changed my mind!
| ||
|
He has never linked Islam and terrorism" You say shit like this and no idea what it means. Obama can not link the two, you and I can, but he cannot. You have no sense about what being a leader means. There are things you can not say. It will infer a prejudice that you don't intend. Not all muslims are terrorist, and not all terrorist are muslims. It's not even a possible logical assumption to just put the two together. It would not be just wrong. it would be illogical and inflaming for a leader to do it. . Oh I forgot you're not logical... But of course we're the biggest, baddest, dude on the block, so we can say anything we damn well please. it only has to be partially true. you understand that, because you're so good at it. What would happen here if I said. There are people here who believe in Christ and are unwilling to accept other beliefs, they only want the words to Christ to govern us. They are "Christian Terrorists"
| ||
|
You'll say how stupid the idea of "Christian Terrorist" is. but when the terrorism actually done is measured between Muslim and Christian..... it would take 1000 years for the Muslim to catch up! So then Christians are terrorists!, at least as mush as the people of Islam are terrorists. let me save some time...before you even respond. I know you will not understand my intent and my meaning, and the question I am posing. So I'll say it already.....You just don't get it!
| ||
|
We can talk about "Christian terrorists" but it's not my point, you missed my point way back when. I said you wouldn't get it, and obviously you don't. But anyway let's play your game, since you don't want to play mine. I had inferred to past Christian terrorists.....from the Crusades and Reformation, to the battles against science, The Wars, and the book burnings, etc. etc. But of course we don't have to go that far back.... current Christian Terrorists include ..White Christian supremacy groups, Christian Identity groups, and pro-life terrorists. The Oklahoma city bombing, the shooting in South Carolina, abortion clinic bombings and doctor killings all of these, at least in part, in the name of Christianity. This is what I'm talking about. No where in the world...do I know of a group who is more directly responsible for terrorism than Muslims..... not that Muslim have more terrorist groups, because Christian have them to. But muslims are the only ones that don't imprison their nuts, don't condemn their behavior. praise them, and send the to heaven(or whatever they call it) I hold those muslims, who are not terrorist, responsible. They are responsible because of their failure to do anything about it., and those that silent inadvertently condone it. I would be a hypocrite to not say the same thing about Christian Terrorists...and their terrorist nuts too. Who am I to blame, for them. I took this from a published article..... "Many Americans like to think of their country as a Christian nation (many Republicans, born-agains, neocons, evangelical groups). In the name of religious freedom they have inadvertently encouraged hate groups and provided a cover to intolerance." Your ignorance, your silence, your accepting of Christian terrorist support is what I blame. You may not be quite as bad, because you imprison those nuts..but still you're bad. I will not be silent, I will not condone your behavior of ignorance and silence. No only are there Christian terrorists in this country, but they reside in the Republican Party.......So be it This wasn't where I wanted to go...but you took me there.
| ||
|
okay maisie, let's go back to my game The president can't say Christian terrorists.....do you get that? it doesn't matter what it is ..Obama can't say it, he can't put those two words together. he would be offensive to all Christians Okay maisie let's see if you can put one and one together and come up with less than two If he can't say Christian terrorist... he also can't say Islamic terrorist. if he put those words together he would offensive to all people of Islam We can say it, because it doesn't matter what you or I, think or mean It matters what the President thinks and means...except of course to you...then it doesn't matter what he means, it only matters what you think he means.
| ||
8/31/2015 1:32 pm |
Interesting question: “When a TV personality hosts a political debate or conducts an interview with a politician, what is their role? Regarding Donald Trump: If it happens to be someone like Limbaugh, Hannity, Oriley etc. doing the interviewing, of course Trump would have got his rear end smooched. And I believe the interviewers are selected because of *who they are. Megan Kelly simply did her job and she did it extreamly well. Most importantly she proved to the world that Trump would not have anywhere near the emotional stability needed to be pres. Masterful!
|
×
×