Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service
Blogs >   > My Blog


posts

Member Deleted Post

This post has been deleted by

spiritwoman45

4/1/2015 10:20 am

 On a positive note some businesses and organizations with financial clout (the only thing that really has any impact) were moved to action. Specific issues aside it is encouraging to see that people will still stand up and say enough is enough and actually DO something.
Spiritwoman ^i^


GavinLS2 69M
1525 posts
4/1/2015 11:48 am
    Quoting Shirleyjean:
    The Indiana law was clearly intended to be discriminatory and was "outed" as such...the politicians are now dealing with the fallout. Arkansas considering the same sort of law is now scrambling to clarify the law as is Indiana...all of your questions are simply smoke to attempt to justify the unjustifiable.
I disagree. It was intended to be DEFENSIVE. Not discriminatory. Unless one feels it's okay to abuse one group so as not to abuse a preferred group?

Was the same Federal version "clearly intended to be discriminatory" when Bill Clinton signed it?

GBU,

Gavin


Rentier1

4/6/2015 7:17 am
    Quoting grandaddy_3:
    Mitee when you are on here as a male do you still wear panties?
No, that would be me.
I especially like frilly ones.




×
×